Skip to content

Google Sold the Top Ad Slot for “Passport Renewal” and the FTC Finally Brought a Lawsuit

FTC Sues GovAssist Over Google Ads Impersonating Passport Services

Google Sold the Top Ad Slot for “Passport Renewal” and the FTC Finally Brought a Lawsuit

you searched for how to renew a U.S. passport. Google showed a sponsored result that looked like the government. it was not the government. it was GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and owner Scott Zuckerman, according to an FTC complaint filed October 22, 2026 in the District of Puerto Rico. the ads ran for years. the State Department website was free the whole time. the ad auction did not care.

allegations, not a final judgment on these defendants. the FTC files a complaint when it has “reason to believe” the law is being violated. the court decides the case. separate October 22 FTC news about a $106.8M debt-relief judgment is a different matter that already reached default judgment.

what the FTC alleges

from the FTC press release (October 22, 2026):

  • since at least October 2023, the defendants ran sites including GovAssist.com, Entry.com, and IVS.us offering passport and visa services while pretending to be affiliated with the U.S. State Department.
  • paid Google ads for queries like “apply for a new passport,” “passport renewal,” and “passport renewal online” routinely placed IVS.us and Entry.com as top sponsored results where people expect official federal services.
  • false service promises: claiming they can directly issue U.S. passports; in many cases consumers only got a completed application they could have obtained free from the State Department.
  • misleading prices: advertised starting at $89; lowest actual offer $119 plus $29 shipping ($148), while downplaying the separate State Department fee so some people paid twice without understanding why.
  • impossible expedites: promising 6-10 or even 3-4 business day expedites faster than the State Department’s fastest possible expedited service.
  • fake Trustpilot “excellent” ratings built on large numbers of fake positive reviews.
  • alleged violations: FTC Act, Impersonation Rule, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.

Christopher Mufarrige, FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection Director: “Using paid Google search ads and landing pages to impersonate the government and target American travelers is illegal.”

the hypocrisy layer (why this is Politics, not just Scams)

  • the ad platform got paid either way. every “passport renewal” auction where a lookalike beat travel.state.gov was a business model, not a glitch.
  • “.gov is free” lost to “sponsored.” the official site did not need a growth team. the impersonators needed a credit card and a landing page.
  • Zuckerman was already under an FTC order in a prior, unrelated Support King LLC stalkerware / privacy case, per the FTC. alleged sequel energy.
  • travelers are not a niche. passports are a civic choke point. impersonating that process is not a quirky SaaS positioning fail. it is dressing up as the state.
  • same-day dual feature: October 22 also brought the FTC phone-deactivation vishing alert and a permanent ban / $106.8M judgment against a debt-relief impersonation ring. impersonating institutions is not a fringe tactic. it is the product category.

what “sponsored” trains people to ignore

for a decade we told users “skip the ads, click the organic .gov.” scammers and grey-pattern lead-gen shops bought the ads anyway, because enough panicked travelers click the first blue link while packing for a flight. the FTC’s parallel work on whether the Impersonation Rule needs updates for ad-optimization practices exists because the old advice does not match the auction.

practical advice that is not a TED talk

  1. for passports, type travel.state.gov yourself. do not start at a search ad.
  2. no private company issues U.S. passports. if a site implies it does, leave.
  3. if a timeline is faster than the State Department’s published expedited service, it is fiction.
  4. companies: stop running brand keywords that imply government affiliation. legal will thank you after the subpoena, not before.
  5. platforms: “we are just the auction” is a business model, not a moral get-out-of-jail card. the FTC is saying the quiet part with letterhead.
related same-week enforcement: on October 22 the FTC also announced a court had entered a $106.8M default judgment and permanent ban against Accelerated Debt Settlement and related entities for an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks, card companies, and government agencies while targeting seniors and veterans. different defendants, same costume closet.

sloth take

we built a search engine that auctions the front door of the government to whoever bids on “passport renewal,” then acted shocked when the winner was not the government. the FTC lawsuit is late and necessary. travelers should bookmark travel.state.gov. platforms should stop pretending sponsored impersonation is a surprising edge case. and if your growth team wants to “own the passport intent keywords,” maybe own a hobby instead.

Need a ruthless review of how your own ads and landing pages could be mistaken for something they are not? Book Dark Edge Consulting.

sources

  • FTC press release: “FTC Sues Perpetrators of Government Impersonation Scheme Over Deceptive Ads, Misleading Promises and Fake Reviews” (2026-10-22)
  • FTC case page: GovAssist (2523141)
  • FTC press release on Accelerated Debt Settlement judgment (2026-10-22)
  • FTC consumer alert on FTC phone-deactivation impersonation (2026-10-22)